Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 2.7× cheaper for typical traffic ; Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index (57.6 vs 45.4).
Prices checked Oct 21, 2026
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $4.00 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $20.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 57.6 | 45.4 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Open weights | No | No |
Monthly cost for common workloads
| Workload | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
|---|---|---|
| Customer chatbot 1,000 conversations a day, 8 turns each | $2,299 | $846 |
| Document Q&A (RAG) 500 questions a day over retrieved documents | $476 | $209 |
| Coding / tool-using agent 200 tasks a day, long tool-heavy contexts | $894 | $392 |
| Content generation 30 long articles a day | $55.80 | $18.90 |
| Classification / extraction 100,000 short items a day | $4,500 | $2,070 |
Estimates include cached-input discounts where a model offers them. Try your own numbers in the cost calculator.
Which one to choose
- Lowest cost: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) — 2.7× cheaper on a 3:1 input/output mix.