GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPT-5.6 Luna is 6.7× cheaper for typical traffic ; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index (45.4 vs 37.3).
Prices checked Oct 21, 2026
| GPT-5.6 Luna | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.20 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 37.3 | 45.4 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Open weights | No | No |
Monthly cost for common workloads
| Workload | GPT-5.6 Luna | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
|---|---|---|
| Customer chatbot 1,000 conversations a day, 8 turns each | $134 | $846 |
| Document Q&A (RAG) 500 questions a day over retrieved documents | $25.38 | $209 |
| Coding / tool-using agent 200 tasks a day, long tool-heavy contexts | $52.20 | $392 |
| Content generation 30 long articles a day | $3.24 | $18.90 |
| Classification / extraction 100,000 short items a day | $234 | $2,070 |
Estimates include cached-input discounts where a model offers them. Try your own numbers in the cost calculator.
Which one to choose
- Lowest cost: GPT-5.6 Luna — 6.7× cheaper on a 3:1 input/output mix.
- Longer documents: GPT-5.6 Luna reads up to 1.05M tokens at once.